Author

admin

Browsing

Coelacanth Energy Inc. (TSXV: CEI,OTC:CEIEF) (‘Coelacanth’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce its financial and operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025. All dollar figures are Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.

HIGHLIGHTS

    • Increased oil and natural gas sales 381% to $11.4 million in Q3 2025 from $2.4 million in Q3 2024.
    • Subsequent to September 30, 2025, entered into a $80.0 million credit facility with current lender to replace its previous credit facilities.
    FINANCIAL RESULTS Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
      September 30 September 30
    ($000s, except per share amounts)  2025  2024  % Change  2025  2024  % Change
                 
    Oil and natural gas sales         11,372           2,362              381         18,866  9,192  105
                 
    Cash flow from (used in) operating activities           4,712         (3,730)            (226)           4,054  (954)  (525)
         Per share – basic and diluted (1)             0.01           (0.01)            (200)             0.01  (-)   (100)
                 
    Adjusted funds flow (used) (1)           2,386            (207)         (1,253)              533  1,133  (53)
         Per share – basic and diluted                  –  (-)   (-)                   –  –  –
                 
    Net loss         (1,764)         (2,464)              (28)         (8,845)  (5,994)  48
         Per share – basic and diluted  (-)   (-)                   –           (0.02)  (0.01)  100
                 
    Capital expenditures (1)           6,104         15,760              (61)         46,078  19,545  136
                 
    Adjusted working capital (deficiency) (1)             (46,606)  47,264  (199)
                 
    Common shares outstanding (000s)            
         Weighted average – basic and diluted       532,917       530,212                  1       532,218  529,605  –
                 
         End of period – basic             533,029  530,267  1
         End of period – fully diluted             591,544  617,214  (4)

     

    (1) See ‘Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures’ section.

      Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
    OPERATING RESULTS (1) September 30 September 30
       2025  2024  % Change  2025  2024  % Change
                 
    Daily production (2)            
         Oil and condensate (bbls/d)          1,372             221           521             703             268           162
         Other NGLs (bbls/d)               92               33           179               48               36             33
         Oil and NGLs (bbls/d)          1,464             254           476             751             304           147
         Natural gas (mcf/d)        10,896          3,450           216          6,050          3,702             63
         Oil equivalent (boe/d)          3,280             829           296          1,759             921             91
                 
    Oil and natural gas sales            
         Oil and condensate ($/bbl)          79.73          89.68           (11)          81.36          90.88           (10)
         Other NGLs ($/bbl)          26.40          31.39           (16)          28.48          33.20           (14)
         Oil and NGLs ($/bbl)          76.41          82.10             (7)          77.99          84.00             (7)
         Natural gas ($/mcf)            1.08            1.41           (23)            1.74            2.16           (19)
         Oil equivalent ($/boe)          37.69          30.99             22          39.28          36.41               8
                 
    Royalties            
         Oil and NGLs ($/bbl)          17.22          15.52             11          17.21          19.73           (13)
         Natural gas ($/mcf)            0.01            0.06           (83)            0.12            0.23           (48)
         Oil equivalent ($/boe)            7.70            5.02             53            7.76            7.44               4
                 
    Operating expenses            
         Oil and NGLs ($/bbl)            7.92          10.07           (21)            8.90          10.10           (12)
         Natural gas ($/mcf)            1.28            1.68           (24)            1.48            1.68           (12)
         Oil equivalent ($/boe)            7.79          10.07           (23)            8.90          10.10           (12)
                 
    Net transportation expenses (3)            
         Oil and NGLs ($/bbl)            4.25            2.36             80            4.11            2.30             79
         Natural gas ($/mcf)            0.48            0.76           (37)            0.58            0.72           (19)
         Oil equivalent ($/boe)            3.48            3.91           (11)            3.75            3.65               3
                 
    Operating netback (loss) (3)            
         Oil and NGLs ($/bbl)          47.02          54.15           (13)          47.77          51.87             (8)
         Natural gas ($/mcf)          (0.69)          (1.09)           (37)          (0.44)          (0.47)             (6)
         Oil equivalent ($/boe)          18.72          11.99             56          18.87          15.22             24
                 
    Depletion and depreciation ($/boe)        (10.26)        (14.89)           (31)        (11.41)        (14.71)           (22)
    General and administrative expenses ($/boe)          (4.61)        (12.51)           (63)          (9.14)        (13.90)           (34)
    Stock based compensation ($/boe)          (3.82)        (13.81)           (72)          (7.39)        (12.72)           (42)
    Finance expense ($/boe)          (5.64)          (2.71)           108          (8.36)          (1.72)           386
    Finance income ($/boe)            0.16            9.54           (98)            0.46          10.03           (95)
    Unutilized transportation ($/boe)          (0.39)          (9.94)           (96)          (1.45)          (5.96)           (76)
    Net loss ($/boe)          (5.84)        (32.33)           (82)        (18.42)        (23.76)           (22)

     

    (1) See ‘Oil and Gas Terms’ section.
    (2) See ‘Product Types’ section.
    (3) See ‘Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures’ section.

    Selected financial and operational information outlined in this news release should be read in conjunction with Coelacanth’s unaudited condensed interim financial statements and related Management’s Discussion and Analysis (‘MD&A’) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, which are available for review under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ at https://www.sedarplus.ca.

    OPERATIONS UPDATE

    Coelacanth is continuing to work through its business plan of delineating and developing its large Montney resource base at Two Rivers that encompasses over 150 contiguous sections of Montney land tenure.

    We are currently drilling three additional development wells on the 5-19 pad and will systematically bring on production from these wells plus prior drilled wells on the pad from now through early February.

    Future development will consist of continued drilling in the vicinity of the 5-19 pad while significant step-outs will be incorporated into the capital budget to accelerate the delineation of the resource both aerially through the land base and vertically through the various Montney zones present on the land base.

    We look forward to reporting on future developments as they arise.

    OIL AND GAS TERMS

    The Company uses the following frequently recurring oil and gas industry terms in the news release:

    Liquids
    Bbls
    Bbls/d
    NGLs
    Condensate

    Barrels
    Barrels per day
    Natural gas liquids (includes condensate, pentane, butane, propane, and ethane)
    Pentane and heavier hydrocarbons 

    Natural Gas
    Mcf
    Mcf/d
    MMcf/d

    Thousands of cubic feet
    Thousands of cubic feet per day
    Millions of cubic feet per day

    Oil Equivalent
    Boe
    Boe/d
    Barrels of oil equivalent
    Barrels of oil equivalent per day

     

    Disclosure provided herein in respect of a boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent has been used for the calculation of boe amounts in the news release. This boe conversion rate is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.

    NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES

    This news release refers to certain measures that are not determined in accordance with IFRS (or ‘GAAP’). These non-GAAP and other financial measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities. The non-GAAP and other financial measures should not be considered alternatives to, or more meaningful than, financial measures that are determined in accordance with IFRS as indicators of the Company’s performance. Management believes that the presentation of these non-GAAP and other financial measures provides useful information to shareholders and investors in understanding and evaluating the Company’s ongoing operating performance, and the measures provide increased transparency to better analyze the Company’s performance against prior periods on a comparable basis.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Adjusted funds flow (used)
    Management uses adjusted funds flow (used) to analyze performance and considers it a key measure as it demonstrates the Company’s ability to generate the cash necessary to fund future capital investments and abandonment obligations and to repay debt, if any. Adjusted funds flow (used) is a non-GAAP financial measure and has been defined by the Company as cash flow from (used in) operating activities excluding the change in non-cash working capital related to operating activities, movements in restricted cash deposits and expenditures on decommissioning obligations. Management believes the timing of collection, payment or incurrence of these items involves a high degree of discretion and as such may not be useful for evaluating the Company’s cash flows. Adjusted funds flow (used) is reconciled from cash flow from (used in) operating activities as follows:

    Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
    September 30 September 30
    ($000s)  2025  2024  2025  2024
    Cash flow from (used in) operating activities   4,712  (3,730)  4,054  (954)
    Add (deduct):
         Decommissioning expenditures  198  790  385  1,266
         Change in restricted cash deposits  –  2,139  –  2,985
         Change in non-cash working capital  (2,524)  594  (3,906)  (2,164)
    Adjusted funds flow (used) (non-GAAP)  2,386  (207)  533  1,133

     

    Net transportation expenses
    Management considers net transportation expenses an important measure as it demonstrates the cost of utilized transportation related to the Company’s production. Net transportation expenses is calculated as transportation expenses less unutilized transportation and is calculated as follows:

    Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
    September 30 September 30
    ($000s)  2025  2024  2025  2024
    Transportation expenses  1,168  1,055  2,498  2,426
    Unutilized transportation  (119)  (757)  (699)  (1,504)
    Net transportation expenses (non-GAAP)  1,049  298  1,799  922

     

    Operating netback
    Management considers operating netback an important measure as it demonstrates its profitability relative to current commodity prices. Operating netback is calculated as oil and natural gas sales less royalties, operating expenses, and net transportation expenses and is calculated as follows:

    Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
    September 30 September 30
    ($000s)  2025  2024  2025  2024
    Oil and natural gas sales  11,372  2,362  18,866  9,192
    Royalties  (2,324)  (383)  (3,725)  (1,878)
    Operating expenses  (2,349)  (767)  (4,272)  (2,549)
    Net transportation expenses  (1,049)  (298)  (1,799)  (922)
    Operating netback (non-GAAP)  5,650  914  9,070  3,843

     

    Capital expenditures
    Coelacanth utilizes capital expenditures as a measure of capital investment on property, plant, and equipment, exploration and evaluation assets and property acquisitions compared to its annual budgeted capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are calculated as follows:

    Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
    September 30 September 30
    ($000s)  2025  2024  2025  2024
    Capital expenditures – property, plant, and equipment  4,238  396  5,276  973
    Capital expenditures – exploration and evaluation assets  1,866  15,364  40,802  18,572
    Capital expenditures (non-GAAP)  6,104  15,760  46,078  19,545

     

    Capital Management Measures

    Adjusted working capital (deficiency)
    Management uses adjusted working capital (deficiency) as a measure to assess the Company’s financial position. Adjusted working capital (deficiency) is calculated as current assets and restricted cash deposits less current liabilities, excluding the current portion of decommissioning obligations.

    ($000s)  September 30, 2025  December 31, 2024
    Current assets  4,259  11,579
    Less:     
         Current liabilities   (56,325)  (37,234)
    Working capital deficiency  (52,066)  (25,655)
    Add:     
         Restricted cash deposits  4,900  4,900
         Current portion of decommissioning obligations  560  2,118
    Adjusted working capital deficiency (Capital management measure)  (46,606)  (18,637)

     

    Non-GAAP Financial Ratios

    Adjusted Funds Flow (Used) per Share
    Adjusted funds flow (used) per share is a non-GAAP financial ratio, calculated using adjusted funds flow (used) and the same weighted average basic and diluted shares used in calculating net loss per share.

    Net transportation expenses per boe
    The Company utilizes net transportation expenses per boe to assess the per unit cost of utilized transportation related to the Company’s production. Net transportation expenses per boe is calculated as net transportation expenses divided by total production for the applicable period.

    Operating netback per boe
    The Company utilizes operating netback per boe to assess the operating performance of its petroleum and natural gas assets on a per unit of production basis. Operating netback per boe is calculated as operating netback divided by total production for the applicable period.

    Supplementary Financial Measures

    The supplementary financial measures used in this news release (primarily average sales price per product type and certain per boe and per share figures) are either a per unit disclosure of a corresponding GAAP measure, or a component of a corresponding GAAP measure, presented in the financial statements. Supplementary financial measures that are disclosed on a per unit basis are calculated by dividing the aggregate GAAP measure (or component thereof) by the applicable unit for the period. Supplementary financial measures that are disclosed on a component basis of a corresponding GAAP measure are a granular representation of a financial statement line item and are determined in accordance with GAAP.

    PRODUCT TYPES

    The Company uses the following references to sales volumes in the news release:

    Natural gas refers to shale gas
    Oil and condensate refers to condensate and tight oil combined
    Other NGLs refers to butane, propane and ethane combined
    Oil and NGLs refers to tight oil and NGLs combined
    Oil equivalent refers to the total oil equivalent of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs combined, using the conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of shale gas to one barrel of oil equivalent.

    The following is a complete breakdown of sales volumes for applicable periods by specific product types of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs:

      Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
      September 30 September 30
    Sales Volumes by Product Type  2025  2024  2025  2024
             
    Condensate (bbls/d)  46  33  27  36
    Other NGLs (bbls/d)  92  33  48  36
    NGLs (bbls/d)  138  66  75  72
             
    Tight oil (bbls/d)  1,326  188  676  232
    Condensate (bbls/d)  46  33  27  36
    Oil and condensate (bbls/d)  1,372  221  703  268
    Other NGLs (bbls/d)  92  33  48  36
    Oil and NGLs (bbls/d)  1,464  254  751  304
             
    Shale gas (mcf/d)  10,896  3,450  6,050  3,702
    Natural gas (mcf/d)  10,896  3,450  6,050  3,702
             
    Oil equivalent (boe/d)  3,280  829  1,759  921

     

    FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

    This document contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words ‘expect’, ‘anticipate’, ‘continue’, ‘estimate’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘should’, ‘believe’, ‘intends’, ‘forecast’, ‘plans’, ‘guidance’ and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.

    More particularly and without limitation, this news release contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company’s oil and condensate, other NGLs, and natural gas production, capital programs, and adjusted working capital. The forward-looking statements and information are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including expectations and assumptions relating to prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates, applicable royalty rates and tax laws, future well production rates, the performance of existing wells, the success of drilling new wells, the availability of capital to undertake planned activities, and the availability and cost of labour and services.

    Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as operational risks in development, exploration and production, delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures, the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production rates, costs, and expenses, commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations, marketing and transportation, environmental risks, competition, the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and changes in tax, royalty, and environmental legislation. The forward-looking statements and information contained in this document are made as of the date hereof for the purpose of providing the readers with the Company’s expectations for the coming year. The forward-looking statements and information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.

    Coelacanth is an oil and natural gas company, actively engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration, and production of oil and natural gas reserves in northeastern British Columbia, Canada.

    Further Information

    For additional information, please contact:

    Coelacanth Energy Inc.
    Suite 2110, 530 – 8th Avenue SW
    Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8
    Phone: (403) 705-4525
    www.coelacanth.ca

    Mr. Robert J. Zakresky
    President and Chief Executive Officer

    Mr. Nolan Chicoine
    Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/275291

    News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    • Drilling continues to expand Kossou’s mineralised footprint, supporting the geological model and future resource definition work
    • Drilling confirms strong continuity at the Jagger Zone, a key gold target of Kossou’s emerging resource base
    • Additional strike extension at the Road Cut Zone highlights the scalability of mineralisation along the Contact Zone Fault

    NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES.

    Kobo Resources Inc. (‘ Kobo’ or the ‘ Company ‘) ( TSX.V: KRI ) is pleased to announce results of a further 12 boreholes from its ongoing diamond drill program at the 100%-owned Kossou Gold Project (‘ Kossou ‘) in Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa. The latest 12 boreholes total 2,755 metres (‘ m ‘) of drilling, bringing cumulative diamond drilling at Kossou to 26,267 m and total drilling completed to 32,154 m.

    This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251120011105/en/

    Figure 1: Jagger Zone Drill Hole Locations and Simplified Geology

    Diamond Drill Results – Highlights:

    Jagger Zone:

    • KDD0110
      • 6.0 m at 1.81 g/t Au from surface
      • 6.0 m at 1.77 g/t Au from 10.0 m
      • 8.0 m at 2.82 g/t Au from 148.0 m
    • KDD0111
      • 7.0 m at 1.66 g/t Au from 44.0 m
      • 9.0 m at 3.60 g/t Au from 119.0 m, including 6.45 m at 4.74 g/t Au
    • KDD0113
      • 8.0 m at 2.54 g/t Au from 188.0 m

    Road Cut Zone:

    • KDD0112
      • 5.0 m at 3.42 g/t from 120.0 m, including 2.0 m at 7.13 g/t Au
    • KDD0118
      • 4.0 m at 3.47 g/t Au from 222.0 m

    Edward Gosselin, CEO and Director of Kobo commented: ‘The latest results at Jagger and Road Cut Zone give us further confidence in the interpretation and modelling of the principal mineralised shears at Kossou. These results continue to strengthen the resource potential we are currently defining on the Jagger and Road Cut Zone targets.’

    He continued: ‘We continue with our aggressive exploration campaign in the district, currently evaluating encouraging gold showings in new areas along the western parts of the Kossou permit, which we expect to generate drill targets, along with newly discovered artisanal workings at the Kadie Zone. With less than 25% of the licence systematically explored, we strongly believe our successful approach to date supports significant potential for additional discoveries and expansion of the resource base at Kossou.’

    Jagger Zone Highlights

    Well mineralised intersections are reported at the Jagger Zone between JZ500 and JZ600 (Jagger Structure 6) near surface, confirming the interpreted structural controls to gold mineralisation along the Jagger Shear Zone. See Figure 1 for a simplified geology map and drill hole locations.

    Mineralisation grading 8.0 m at 2.82 g/t Au (KDD0110) (see Figure 3), 9.0 m at 3.60 g/t Au (KDD0111) (see Figure 2) and 7.0 m at 1.36 g/t Au ( KDD0115) was reported in Structure 6 at Jagger Zone in these boreholes. The mineralisation in KDD0110 is comparable to the mineralised intersection reported previously on the same drill section (borehole KDD0028 grading 8.0 m at 3.72 g/t Au ).

    A broad mineralised zone grading 26.0 m at 0.60 g/t Au (Figure 3) was also intersected in the upper 25.0 m oxidised zone near surface in KDD0110 in central parts of the shear zone.

    Road Cut Zone Highlights

    Drilling at the Road Cut Zone has focused on two main targets identified to date. The main shear intersected previously on RCZ800, together with mineralisation associated with the Contact Zone Fault and the shears in close proximity of this first order fault. See Figure 4 for simplified geology map and drill hole locations.

    Borehole KDD0112 on Section RCZ400 intersected 5.0 m at 3.42 g/t Au associated with the northern strike continuation of the artisanal mine shear zone (see Figure 5). Anomalous grades (0.20-0.25 g/t Au) were also reported along Contact Zone Fault on this section. Borehole KDD0114 on RCZ350 intersected mineralisation grading 4.0m at 0.96 g/t Au confirming the quartz veining and alteration along the Contact Zone Fault to the north of that previously reported.

    Encouraging gold intersections have also been reported along the one of the main shears within the mafic package associated with a well-defined shear on RCZ800 . All 3 boreholes in the area intersected the well-developed shear zone. The best intersection was in borehole KDD0118 on RCZ825 (4.0 m at 3.47 g/t Au) , with more anomalous intercepts in KDD0121 on RCZ750 (2.0 m at 2.27 g/t Au and 3.0 m at 1.34 g/t Au) and KDD0116 on RCZ800 (4.0 m at 0.80 g/t Au).

    Table 1: Summary of Significant Diamond Drill Hole Results

    BHID

    East

    North

    Elev.

    Az.

    Dip

    Length

    From (m)

    To (m)

    Int. (m)

    Au g/t

    Target

    KDD0110

    229055

    775308

    346

    70

    -50

    194.4

    0.00

    6.00

    6.00

    1.81

    Jagger

    10.00

    36.00

    26.00

    0.60

    Jagger

    incl. 10.00

    16.00

    6.00

    1.77

    Jagger

    52.00

    60.00

    8.00

    0.62

    Jagger

    148.00

    156.00

    8.00

    2.82

    Jagger

    KDD0111

    229049

    775359

    334

    70

    -50

    179.4

    0.00

    4.00

    4.00

    0.79

    Jagger

    28.00

    30.00

    2.00

    0.50

    Jagger

    42.00

    51.00

    9.00

    0.99

    Jagger

    incl. 44.00

    51.00

    7.00

    1.66

    Jagger

    57.00

    60.00

    3.00

    0.55

    Jagger

    64.00

    66.00

    2.00

    0.50

    Jagger

    119.00

    128.00

    9.00

    3.60

    Jagger

    incl. 120.40

    126.85

    6.45

    4.74

    Jagger

    149.00

    152.00

    3.00

    0.35

    Jagger

    KDD0112

    228441

    776362

    245

    70

    -50

    206.3

    4.00

    9.00

    5.00

    0.40

    RCZ

    120.00

    125.00

    5.00

    3.42

    RCZ

    incl. 120.00

    122.00

    2.00

    7.13

    RCZ

    203.00

    205.00

    2.00

    0.92

    RCZ

    KDD0113

    228912

    775469

    320

    70

    -50

    266.4

    105.00

    110.00

    5.00

    0.49

    Jagger

    119.00

    121.00

    2.00

    1.55

    Jagger

    148.00

    159.00

    11.00

    0.81

    Jagger

    188.00

    196.00

    8.00

    2.54

    Jagger

    214.00

    217.00

    3.00

    0.53

    Jagger

    KDD0114

    228404

    776402

    246

    70

    -50

    269.3

    10.00

    13.00

    3.00

    1.21

    RCZ

    34.00

    35.00

    1.00

    7.22*

    RCZ

    50.00

    52.00

    2.00

    2.98

    RCZ

    199.00

    203.00

    4.00

    0.96

    RCZ

    KDD0115

    229050

    775411

    316

    70

    -50

    167.4

    102.00

    109.00

    7.00

    1.36

    Jagger

    113.00

    116.00

    3.00

    0.73

    Jagger

    136.00

    147.00

    11.00

    0.61

    Jagger

    incl. 140.00

    144.00

    4.00

    1.36

    Jagger

    154.00

    157.00

    3.00

    1.84

    Jagger

    KDD0116

    228406

    775924

    289

    70

    -50

    302.3

    15.00

    17.00

    2.00

    1.89

    RCZ

    45.00

    48.00

    3.00

    1.48

    RCZ

    93.00

    95.00

    2.00

    1.86

    RCZ

    205.00

    206.00

    1.00

    10.50

    RCZ

    246.00

    250.00

    4.00

    0.80

    RCZ

    KDD0117

    228909

    775522

    313

    70

    -50

    242.4

    132.00

    136.00

    4.00

    0.33

    Jagger

    146.00

    147.00

    1.00

    2.68*

    Jagger

    166.00

    169.00

    3.00

    1.31

    Jagger

    KDD0118

    228444

    775910

    299

    70

    -50

    251.3

    76.00

    79.00

    3.00

    2.96

    RCZ

    129.00

    133.00

    4.00

    0.47

    RCZ

    187.00

    188.00

    1.00

    2.36*

    RCZ

    222.00

    226.00

    4.00

    3.47

    RCZ

    232.00

    233.00

    1.00

    1.62*

    RCZ

    KDD0119

    228900

    775572

    305

    70

    -50

    221.4

    12.00

    16.00

    4.00

    0.42

    Jagger

    168.00

    170.00

    2.00

    0.88

    Jagger

    195.00

    197.00

    2.00

    2.55

    Jagger

    KDD0120

    228863

    775611

    280

    70

    -50

    224.4

    7.00

    9.00

    2.00

    0.34

    Jagger

    182.00

    189.00

    7.00

    0.56

    Jagger

    KDD0121

    228452

    775994

    283

    70

    -50

    230.3

    38.00

    40.00

    2.00

    0.81

    RCZ

    94.00

    99.00

    5.00

    0.36

    RCZ

    172.00

    174.00

    2.00

    2.37

    RCZ

    183.00

    186.00

    3.00

    1.54

    RCZ

    Notes:

    • Cut-off using 2.0 m at 0.30 g/t Au
    • Intervals are reported with no more than 3.0 m of internal dilution of less than 0.3 m g/t Au except where indicated with an *

    An accurate dip and strike and controls of mineralisation are unconfirmed and mineralised zones are reported as downhole lengths. Drill holes are planned to intersect mineralised zones perpendicular to interpreted targets. All intercepts reported are downhole distances, true widths are unknown.

    Sampling, QA/QC, and Analytical Procedures

    Drill core was logged and sampled by Kobo personnel at site. Drill cores were sawn in half, with one half remaining in the core box and the other half secured into new plastic sample bags with sample number tickets. Core samples are drilled using HQ core barrels to below the level of oxidation and then reduced to NQ core barrels for the remainder of the bore hole. Samples are transported to the SGS Côte d’Ivoire facility in Yamoussoukro by Kobo personnel where the entire sample was prepared for analysis (prep code PRP86/PRP94). Sample splits of 50 grams were then analysed for gold using 50g Fire Assay as per SGS Geochem Method FAA505. QA/QC procedures for the drill program include insertion of a certificated standards every 20 samples, a blank every 20 samples and a duplicate sample every 20 samples. All QAQC control samples returned values within acceptable limits.

    Review of Technical Information

    The scientific and technical information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Paul Sarjeant, P.Geo., who is a Qualified Persons as defined in National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Sarjeant is the President and Chief Operating Officer and Director of Kobo.

    About Kobo Resources Inc.

    Kobo Resources is a growth-focused gold exploration company with a compelling new gold discovery in Côte d’Ivoire, one of West Africa’s most prolific and developing gold districts, hosting several multi-million-ounce gold mines. The Company’s 100%-owned Kossou Gold Project is located approximately 20 km northwest of the capital city of Yamoussoukro and is directly adjacent to one of the region’s largest gold mines with established processing facilities.

    With over 26,200 metres of diamond drilling, nearly 5,900 metres of reverse circulation (RC) drilling, and 5,900 metres of trenching completed since 2023, Kobo has made significant progress in defining the scale and prospectivity of its Kossou’s Gold Project. Exploration has focused on multiple high-priority targets within a 9+ km strike length of highly prospective gold-in-soil geochemical anomalies, with drilling confirming extensive mineralisation at the Jagger, Road Cut, and Kadie Zones. The latest phase of drilling has further refined structural controls on gold mineralisation, setting the stage for the next phase of systematic exploration and resource development.

    Beyond Kossou, the Company is advancing exploration at its Kotobi Permit and is actively expanding its land position in Côte d’Ivoire with prospective ground, aligning with its strategic vision for long-term growth in-country. Kobo remains committed to identifying and developing new opportunities to enhance its exploration portfolio within highly prospective gold regions of West Africa. Kobo offers investors the exciting combination of high-quality gold prospects led by an experienced leadership team with in-country experience. Kobo’s common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ‘KRI’. For more information, please visit www.koboresources.com .

    NEITHER THE TSXV NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSXV) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

    Cautionary Statement on Forward-looking Information:

    This news release contains ‘forward-looking information’ and ‘forward-looking statements’ (collectively, ‘forward-looking statements’) within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements and are based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release. Any statement that involves discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often but not always using phrases such as ‘expects’, or ‘does not expect’, ‘is expected’, ‘anticipates’ or ‘does not anticipate’, ‘plans’, ‘budget’, ‘scheduled’, ‘forecasts’, ‘estimates’, ‘believes’ or ‘intends’ or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results ‘may’ or ‘could’, ‘would’, ‘might’ or ‘will’ be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; and the delay or failure to receive board, shareholder or regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements and information contained in this news release. Except as required by law, Kobo assumes no obligation and/or liability to update the forward-looking statements of beliefs, opinions, projections, or other factors, should they change, except as required by law.

    View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251120011105/en/

    For further information:
    Edward Gosselin
    Chief Executive Officer and Director
    1-418-609-3587
    ir@kobores.com

    Twitter: @KoboResources | LinkedIn: Kobo Resources Inc.

    News Provided by Business Wire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Critical Mineral Resources plc (“CMR”, “Company”) is delighted to announce the arrival of its diamond core drilling rig at Agadir Melloul, marking a major step forward that puts the project in an excellent position to accelerate drilling activity. The team is now focused on commissioning the rig as quickly as possible, with the first bore hole expected to be drilled during the first half of December.

    Highlights

    The Company’s fully refurbished Discovery HD track-mounted diamond core drill has arrived at Agadir Melloul. Some important features:

    • Fitted with brand new Caterpillar 308E steel tracks for rapid moves between drill pads
    • Compact, robust design with a heavy-duty telescopic mast and powerful hoisting winch capable of pulling the complete drill string from the ground and pulling in 20 ft sections
    • Drilling depth capacity of 1400m NQ (47.6mm core), 876m HQ (63.5mm core)
    • Delivered with new consumable parts such as jaws, bushings and comprehensive remote site spares kit to minimise risk of downtime

    The rig is expected to be operational during the first half of December, almost immediately doubling our drilling capacity.

    Charlie Long CEO commented:

    “It has been quite a journey for our Discovery HD rig and its arrival represents an important milestone for the project. The rig has undergone a comprehensive refurbishment and is effectively as good as new. With proper care, we expect it to deliver consistent performance for the next decade and provide significant per metre cost savings.

    Multi Power, the manufacturer, was extremely supportive, generously installing a brand new feed cylinder, instead of resealing the original, replacing key components including foot clamp, and completely stripping and professionally repainting the mast. New Cat 308E tracks were also sourced and installed to ensure maximum efficiency.

    The additional refurbishment and some shipping complications meant the rig arrived later than originally planned. It is a testament to our team on the ground, and the advantages of operating in Morocco, that once we knew of the delay, we were quickly able to secure the services of a trusted drilling contractor who began work immediately, ensuring that progress continued uninterrupted.

    We are now carefully unpacking and inspecting all components, and with our newly appointed drill operator already in place, the team is ready to commission and bring the rig into operation without delay. The arrival of our rig puts us in an excellent position to significantly accelerate drilling and to advance on all fronts, simultaneously drilling both the sedimentary copper deposit and the exciting new Rhyolite discovery.

    We look forward to seeing the Discovery HD drill its first holes in the first half of December”.

    Fig.1 Discovery HD track-mounted diamond drill at Agadir Melloul

    Source: Company

    Critical Mineral Resources PLC
    Charles Long, Chief Executive Officer

    info@cmrplc.com

    AlbR Capital
    Jon Belliss

    +44 (0) 20 7399 9425

    Notes To Editors

    Critical Mineral Resources (CMR) PLC is an exploration and development company focused on developing assets that produce critical minerals for the global economy, including those essential for electrification and the clean energy revolution. Many of these commodities are widely recognised as being at the start of a supply and demand super cycle.

    CMR is building a diversified portfolio of high-quality metals exploration and development projects in Morocco, focusing on copper, manganese and potentially other critical minerals and metals. CMR identified Morocco as an ideal mining-friendly jurisdiction that meets its acquisition and operational criteria. The country is perfectly located to supply raw materials to Europe and possesses excellent prospective geology, good infrastructure and attractive permitting, tax and royalty conditions. In 2023, the Company acquired an 80% stake in leading Moroccan exploration and geological services company Atlantic Research Minerals SARL.

    The Company is listed on the London Stock Exchange (CMRS.L). More information regarding the Company can be found at www.cmrplc.com

    Source

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Highlights:  

    •  GS2519

    1.08 g/Au over 110.7m one of the most western  

    holes drilled to date in the WOW Zone.

    •  GS2521

    1.7g/t Au over 70.1m

    •  GS2522

    1.44 g/t Au over 22.5m from 4.5m

    •  GS2526

     0.9 g/t Au over 182.9m

    The width refers to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization 

    2025 PROGRAM

    • Drilling is expected to remain ongoing until mid-December
    • Conversion of inferred resources into indicated & further exploration drilling and geotechnical drilling.
    • 54 holes ( ~35,000m) completed
    • Ongoing metallurgical work, focusing on flowsheet optionality with sulphide oxidation is a key part of our strategy to maximize the potential of the resource.

    VANCOUVER, BC, Nov. 20, 2025 /CNW/ – Freegold Ventures Limited (TSX: FVL,OTC:FGOVF) (OTCQX: FGOVF) pleased to announce the results from eight additional drill holes at the Golden Summit project which further demonstrate the project’s resource potential.  To date, the company has completed 54 drill holes, and the drilling of 36,231m including ongoing holes. A substantial number of assay results are still pending with results expected to be reported as they are finalized.

    Objectives of the 2025 Drill Program
    The 2025 drill program aims to upgrade resources, expand mineralization, and define boundaries in the Dolphin and Cleary Zones. This involves exploration, geotechnical, and metallurgical test holes. Significant exploration potential remains both to the west and east of the current deposit.

    Cleary Zone

    Hole

    Depth

    Dip

    Azimuth

    From 

    To

    Interval

    Au

    Number

    (m)

    (m)

    (m)

    g/t

    GS2510

    492.9

    -75

    360

    35.7

    63.1

    27.4

    0.89

    297.8

    316.1

    18.3

    0.82

    370.9

    377

    6.1

    7.50

    425.8

    459.3

    33.5

    1.49

    GS2513

    448.1

    -80

    360

    35.7

    60

    24.3

    1.43

    261.2

    268.5

    7.3

    5.98

     incl

    263.3

    264.3

    1.0

    31.74

    353.6

    383.1

    29.5

    1.06

    407.5

    422.8

    15.3

    0.96

    GS2521

    577.3

    -75

    360

    249

    319.1

    70.1

    1.7

    416.7

    481.3

    64.6

    0.73

    535.5

    577.3

    41.8

    1.29

    The width refers to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization.

    GS2510 had a planned depth of 600m but reached only 492.9m due to difficult drilling conditions. In the target zone, the hole intersected 1.49g/t Au over 32.5m at a depth of 425.8m. GS2513 and GS2521 were both infill holes and part of the 10-hole groundwater investigation program conducted to measure the hydraulic properties of lithologies within the potential proposed pit volume (i.e., schist, granodiorite, and tonalite) through packer testing. The results will provide hydraulic conductivities to inform the conceptual hydrogeologic model and help estimate dewatering needs. Vibrating Wire Piezometers (VWPs) were installed in these 8 of these holes to measure groundwater levels within the potential pit area, including vertical and horizontal gradients, to identify potential fault-block compartmentalization, and to monitor long-term groundwater levels. VWP depths were chosen to target various schist units, granodiorite, and tonalite in each hole.

    GS2513 intersected higher-grade mineralization closer to surface, with 1.43g/t Au over 24.3m from 35.7m. It was also planned for a depth of 600m but was terminated at 448m due to difficult conditions. GS2521 intersected 1.7g/t Au over 70.1m at 259m and an additional 1.29g/t Au at 535.5m; however, the hole was lost in the mineralized zone before reaching the planned depth of 700m.

    Dolphin Zone

    Hole

    Depth

    Dip

    Azimuth

    From 

    To 

    Interval

    Au

    Number

    (m)

    (m)

    (m)

    g/t

    GS2518

    656.2

    -75

    360

    142

    169.1

    27.1

    1.17

    262.7

    307.8

    45.1

    0.86

    364.8

    370

    5.2

    1.35

    507.5

    569.1

    61.6

    0.96

    611.7

    617.8

    6.1

    4.14

    GS2526

    603.6

    -80

    360

    24.2

    25.6

    1.4

    12.19

    37.5

    53.9

    16.4

    1.26

    104.2

    130.2

    26

    0.93

    282.6

    290.2

    7.6

    4.97

    367

    381.6

    14.6

    0.82

    386.2

    569.1

    182.9

    0.9

    incl

    544.2

    569.1

    24.9

    1.29

    The width refers to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization.

    GS2518 was drilled to a depth of 656.2m, but was initially planned to 700m. The hole was lost due to difficult ground conditions, but it still demonstrates the continuity of mineralization. GS2518 was also a hydrological hole. G2526 intersected several zones, with a higher-grade zone closer to the surface of 1.26 g/t Au over 16.4m from a depth of 37.5m, and a broad zone of 0.90 g/t Au over 182.9m from 386.2m. GS2526 lies within the projected potential starter pit area. These results suggest strong mineralization near the surface, which could enhance the economic viability of the starter pit area and support further exploration efforts.

    GS2519, GS2522 and GS2525 – WOW Zone
    GS2519, GS2522 and GS2525 were all drilled within the WOW Zone. All three holes intersected significant zones of over 1.0 g/t Au mineralization, continuing to validate the WOW Zone’s potential to host higher-grade mineralization. GS2519 one of the most western holes drilled in the WOW zone and returned 1.08g/t Au over 110.7m from a depth of 365m.  The hole encountered several other zones over 1.0 g/t Au at depth, including 1.65g/t Au over 54m from 404m, and a further 1.44 g/t Au over 18m from 617m. These intercepts indicate strong mineralization potential to depth and continue to support our ongoing resource model.  GS2522 intersected 1.44 g/t Au over 22.5m from 4.5m, and several other narrower zones of plus 1 g/t Au, again demonstrating the potential of this exciting zone. GS2525 (section 478600), demonstrates the potential to expand the current mineralized envelope with infill drilling. Mineralization in the WOW Zone remains open to depth and along strike to the west and southwest.

    WOW Zone

    Hole

    Depth

    Dip

    Azimuth

    From 

    To 

    Interval

    Au

    Number

    (m)

    (m)

    (m)

    g/t

    GS2519

    755

    -90

    0

    78.3

    86.6

    8.3

    1.11

    108.4

    117.2

    8.8

    1.15

    128

    137

    9

    3.15

    186.3

    198.8

    12.5

    1.39

    365

    475.7

    110.7

    1.08

    incl

    404

    458

    54

    1.65

    536

    598.4

    62.4

    0.87

    617

    635

    18

    1.44

    GS2522

    665

    -75

    360

    4.5

    27

    22.5

    1.44

    142.3

    162.5

    20.2

    0.74

    344

    365

    21

    1.30

    590

    611

    21

    1.05

    GS2525

    539.3

    -70

    360

    59

    72

    13

    1.10

    181.7

    194.8

    13.1

    3.45

    407

    456.4

    49.4

    0.97

    The width refers to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization.

    Metallurgical Update
    Metallurgical test work continues to validate the understanding of the potential process flowsheet for the Golden Summit material. As part of these ongoing studies, an expanded Master Composite of Golden Summit drill core assay rejects has been created and is a primary focus of the ongoing metallurgical test program being conducted at BaseMet Labs in Kamloops, BC.

    The Master Composite consists of assay reject material from 12 drill holes based on multiple continuous intervals in each hole above cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t gold Au subject to a minimum mining thickness of 6m. A total of 1,500kg of material has been blended with the intention of processing through a pilot plant to produce sufficient mass of sulphide concentrate upon which to carry out further optimization test work of the three oxidation processes, which have delivered excellent results to date. Pressure Oxidation (POX), BiOx and Albion Process testing will continue to be applied to Golden Summit concentrate to enable trade-off studies in the Pre-Feasibility Study (‘PFS’).

    The drill holes which have been used in the Master Composite are:

    GS2167, GS2168, GS2201, GS2203, GS2206, GS2207, GS2208, GS2209, GS2438.  GS2439 .GS2440, GS2441 –(see below link for hole locations)

    A total of six tests, each comprised of 20kg of the Master Composite material incorporating gravity recovery, followed by locked-cycle flotation and cleaner flotation to produce a clean sulphide concentrate, have been completed. The mass of the cleaner concentrate is approximately 4.6% of the total feed. The cleaner concentrate was subsequently treated with Albion Process., and the Carbon-In-Leach response of the Albion Process residue was excellent, with over 97% of the gold contained in the cleaner concentrate being recovered by standard CIL techniques. The net overall gold recovery from the feed material was 93.9%.

    Ongoing Program
    The 2025 program is advancing steadily.  In addition to this year’s extensive drilling, other activities supporting the initiation of a Pre-Feasibility Study—such as cultural resource assessments, paleontology, groundwater analysis, and mamma habitat studies—are still underway.

    Since 2020, the Golden Summit project has become one of North America’s largest undeveloped gold resources. The significant increase in resource ounces and grade is the result of targeted drilling campaigns from 2020 to 2024 (over 130,000 meters), ongoing improvements to geological models, and a better understanding of mineralization controls. Positive metallurgical test results have also advanced the project. Ongoing drilling has continued to delineate zones of higher-grade mineralization and to convert previously considered waste areas into potentially economically viable mineralized zones. Continued westward expansion has resulted in the discovery of new higher-grade zones, increasing both indicated gold resources and grades.

    Overall gold recovery rates exceeding 90% have been achieved using a flowsheet consisting of gravity concentration, flotation to produce a cleaner concentrate, subsequently treated with sulphide-oxidizing techniques, including BIOX®,POX, and the Albion Process, producing feed to carbon-in-leach for additional gold recovery from the concentrate.

    As of July 2025, the current Golden Summit resource includes an Indicated Primary Mineral Resource of 17.2 million ounces at 1.24 g/t Au and an Inferred Primary Mineral Resource of 11.9 million ounces at 1.04 g/t Au, calculated using a 0.5 g/t cut-off grade and a gold price of $2,490 three-year trailing average gold price. A significant number of assay results remain pending.

    Drilling is expected to continue until mid-December and resume in February 2026. Results from the 2025 drilling campaign will provide the basis for an updated mineral resource estimate, which will support the upcoming Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS).

    Links to the Plan Map and Section 478600E and Master Composite Drill Hole Locations

    https://freegoldventures.com/site/assets/files/6287/cp-met-drilling-all.png

    https://freegoldventures.com/site/assets/files/6287/nr-2025-drilling-20251119.png

    https://freegoldventures.com/site/assets/files/6287/e478600-section-november2025.pdf

    Update on Shorty Creek
    Freegold and Gold Range were unable to reach an agreement on suitable commercial terms, and the lease for the Shorty Creek project has therefore been terminated.   As we enter this transformational period for Freegold, we believe our attention is best focused on Golden Summit.  Accordingly, Freegold’s exploration and development efforts will focus on the highly prospective Golden Summit Project as it advances the project through pre-feasibility over the coming year.

    QA/QC
    HQ Core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw, and one-half placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by MSA Laboratories in Fairbanks, Alaska or ALS’s facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay.  At MSALABS, the entire sample will be dried and crushed to 70% passing -2mm (CRU-CPA). A ~500g riffle split was analyzed for gold using CHRYSOS PhotonAssay (CPA-Au1). From this, 250g will be further riffle split from the original PhotonAssay sample, pulverized, and a 0.25g sub-sample analysed for multi-element geochemistry using MSA’s IMS230 package, which includes 4-acid digestion and ICP-MS finish. MSALABS operates under ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 9001 certified quality systems.

    Core samples were delivered to ALS’s facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen.  A representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using ALS method Au-PA01, which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm, in Thunder Bay.

    In addition, a subsample was analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES).

    A QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of the submittal, and at least one blank every 25 standards.

    The Qualified Person for this release is Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this news release.

    About Freegold Ventures Limited
    Freegold is a TSX-listed company focused on exploration in Alaska.

    Some statements in this news release contain forward-looking information, including, without limitation, statements as to planned expenditures and exploration programs, potential mineralization and resources, exploration results, the completion of an updated NI 43-101 technical report, and any other future plans. These statements address future events and conditions and, as such, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the statements. Such factors include, without limitation, the completion of planned expenditures, the ability to complete exploration programs on schedule, and the success of exploration programs. See Freegold’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31st, 2024, filed under Freegold’s profile at www.sedar.com, for a detailed discussion of the risk factors associated with Freegold’s operations.

     

    SOURCE Freegold Ventures Limited

    View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/November2025/20/c7339.html

    News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Nearly two dozen House Democrats defied their party leaders’ wishes Tuesday to vote in favor of rebuking a progressive lawmaker for what critics called an unfair move to tip the scales in his district’s next election.

    The House voted to pass a resolution of disapproval against Rep. Jesús ‘Chuy’ García, a measure that was led by one of his fellow Democrats — moderate Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash.

    It passed in a 236 to 183 vote, with 23 Democrats voting with the GOP to rebuke García. Four lawmakers voted ‘present’ — Reps. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., Suhas Subramanyam, D-Va., and Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio.

    The Democrats who voted with Republicans include Reps. Kristen McDonald Rivet, D-Mich., Sharice Davids, D-Kan., Laura Gillen, D-N.Y., Angie Craig, D-Minn., Kathy Castor, D-Fla., Jared Golden, D-Maine, Pat Ryan, D-N.Y., and Perez.

    ‘I’m on the Ethics Committee — I just generally, for stuff that should be referred to the Ethics Committee, I voted present,’ Subramanyam told Fox News Digital of his vote.

    Houlahan said, ‘I worry that we’re in an endless cycle of tit-for-tat. What [Garcia] did was not correct. But my choice was to say that this needed to be taken up in the Ethics Committee. That’s why I voted the way I voted, because I don’t want people to continue to bring up resolutions against each other for every single thing that happens.’

    Craig and Perez declined to elaborate on their votes.

    Perez had accused García of ‘undermining the process of a free and fair election’ by abruptly changing course on his re-election bid hours before the filing deadline in his deep-blue Illinois district. Critics of the move said the timing ensured García’s chief of staff was the only person able to file to run instead.

    The division caused a political headache for House Democratic leadership, which opposed the resolution.

    House Democrats who voted in favor of rebuking García did so against the expressed wishes of Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., who said Monday that Americans were ‘focused on the high cost of living in the United States of America.’

    ‘I do not support the so-called resolution of disapproval, and I strongly support Congressman Chuy García. He’s been a progressive champion for disenfranchised communities for decades, including during his time in Congress. And he’s made life better for the American people,’ Jeffries said.

    He released an additional statement on Tuesday morning alongside Democratic Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., and Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., urging opposition to the resolution.

    ‘He is a good man who has always prioritized the people he represents, even while experiencing unthinkable family tragedy. We unequivocally oppose this misguided resolution and urge our colleagues in the House Democratic Caucus to reject it,’ they wrote.

    García said his decision was due to health reasons for himself and his family, as well as a desire to spend more time with his grandchildren.

    Democrats’ bid to kill the measure failed on Monday night, with Perez and Rep. Jared Golden, D-Maine, voting with Republicans to proceed with the vote.

    Perez laid out her case during debate on the measure shortly thereafter.

    ‘I like Chuy García. I think his reasons for retiring are noble. We are not here to adjudicate the character of Chuy García. I’m asking the body to consider a set of facts laid before us tonight about how he chose his successor and deprived Americans the right to choose their elected representative,’ she said.

    ‘One week before the filing deadline, Congressman Chuy García filed for re-election and submitted the necessary signatures for that petition. But three days before the filing deadline, he also began collecting signatures for his chief of staff, who shares his last name. Just hours before the filing deadline, Representative García’s chief of staff submitted the paperwork to run with at least 2,500 signatures attached to it, and Chuy García’s signature was the very first one listed in the petition.’

    During his own comments, García suggested his wife’s recent multiple sclerosis diagnosis was part of his decision to withdraw, while disputing other accusations against himself.

    ‘I filed to run for Congress because this work is more important than ever, and I wanted to deliver for my community and to be part, hopefully, of a new House majority next year. I followed the rules of Illinois and its election law … And contrary to claims that were made earlier today, I did not circulate any petitions that I was accused of circulating. I only circulated when I filed on the first day,’ García said.

    ‘But as I looked ahead, I had to be honest about what the next term would demand and what my family needed. I saw the big picture — supporting my wife as we managed her illness, taking better care of my own health and being present for the grandson that we just adopted two weeks ago. It was a tough decision, but I made that choice.’

    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

    U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz called the recent killings of Christians in Nigeria ‘genocide wearing the mask of chaos.’

    Waltz made the remarks Tuesday at an event hosted by the United States Mission to the United Nations that spotlighted religious violence and the killings of Christians in the most populous African nation.

    ‘There is a body of evidence, and you are going to hear that from our experts today that paints a very grim picture of disproportionate suffering among Christians, where, again, families are torn apart, clergy is repeatedly assassinated, and entire congregations, church congregations,’ he said.

    ‘Folks, we have an entire faith that is being erased. One bullet at a time, one torched Bible at a time.’

    Rapper Nicki Minaj, who was born in Trinidad and Tobago, also spoke at the event, saying she wanted to speak out against injustice and stand up for people who are persecuted for their beliefs.

    ‘In Nigeria, Christians are being targeted, driven from their homes and killed. Churches have been burned. Families have been torn apart and entire communities live in fear constantly, simply because of how they pray,’ she told attendees.

    ‘Sadly, this problem is not only a growing problem in Nigeria, but also in so many other countries across the world, and it demands urgent action,’ Minaj said. ‘And I want to be clear, protecting Christians in Nigeria is not about taking sides or dividing people. It is about uniting humanity.’

    Minaj’s speech came after President Donald Trump threatened in a November Truth Social post to send U.S. troops ‘guns-a-blazing’ into the most populous country in Africa to ‘completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.’

    The president also threatened to stop all aid and assistance if the violence continued.

    Nigerian President Bola Tinubu responded to Trump’s threat, writing on social media that his administration has worked with Christian and Muslim leaders to address security challenges affecting citizens across all faiths and regions.

    ‘The characterisation of Nigeria as religiously intolerant does not reflect our national reality, nor does it take into consideration the consistent and sincere efforts of the government to safeguard freedom of religion and beliefs for all Nigerians,’ he wrote on X.

    ‘Religious freedom and tolerance have been a core tenet of our collective identity and shall always remain so. Nigeria opposes religious persecution and does not encourage it.’

    Open Doors, an international Christian organization that supports persecuted believers, said attacks are most common in the northern, Muslim-majority states of Nigeria but have started spreading into the Middle Belt and farther south.

    The organization stated that Christians are at risk from targeted attacks by Islamist militants, including Fulani fighters and Boko Haram, and women are often killed and subjected to sexual violence.

    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

    President Donald Trump made a point to shake the hand of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the White House Tuesday in a warm welcome — in contrast to former President Joe Biden, who came under scrutiny for fist-bumping the Saudi prince in 2022.

    Biden’s fist bump occurred during a trip to Saudi Arabia in July 2022, and attracted criticism due to U.S. intelligence reports that indicated that bin Salman signed off on the 2018 assassination of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi. 

    But when bin Salman arrived at the White House Tuesday, Trump indicated that the Saudi prince deserved a more formal greeting.

    ‘And Trump doesn’t give a fist pump. I grab that hand,’ Trump told reporters Tuesday. ‘I don’t give a hell where that hand’s been, I grab that hand. Remember Biden? He travels for 20 hours, he gets out and he gives a fist bump. No. When you get out of the plane and you got the future king and the man who is one of the most respected people in the world, you shake his hand, you don’t give him a fist bump, right?’

    ‘We don’t want to ask you about that,’ Trump said, referencing bin Salman. ‘But I can’t imagine you were thrilled.’

    The Saudi leader’s arrival Tuesday came with full pageantry. A red carpet rolled across the South Lawn, military honor guard and an Air Force flyover underscored the formal state-level welcome.

    Biden’s 2022 fist bump with bin Salman occurred as he stepped out of a vehicle outside the Al Salam Royal Palace in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Afterward, Biden brushed off questions about the interaction from reporters, but told them he suggested to bin Salman that he believed the crown prince was ‘responsible’ for Khashoggi’s death.

    The exchange prompted former Washington Post publisher Fred Ryan to characterize the gesture as more offensive than a handshake.

    ‘The fist bump between President Biden and Mohammed bin Salman was worse than a handshake — it was shameful,’ Ryan said in a statement. ‘It projected a level of intimacy and comfort that delivers to MBS the unwarranted redemption he has been desperately seeking.’ 

    More than a year later, in September 2023, Biden shook hands with bin Salman when they met in person at the G20 global economic summit in New Delhi.

    U.S. intelligence agencies concluded in 2021 that bin Salman gave the green light on the operation that took Khashoggi’s life. Khashoggi, a Saudi dissident, was brutally murdered in Istanbul at the Saudi consulate in 2018.

    Still, bin Salman has denied the veracity of those reports. When asked Tuesday about Khashoggi, bin Salman said that it’s ‘painful’ to hear of the death of anyone for ‘no real purpose,’ and said that ‘we are doing our best that this doesn’t happen again.’

    Trump also came to defend bin Salman Tuesday, and accused a reporter who asked about U.S. intelligence reports linking the prince to Khashoggi’s death of embarrassing bin Salman.

    ‘A lot of people didn’t like that gentleman that you’re talking about,’ Trump said Tuesday. ‘Whether you like him or didn’t like him, things happen, but he knew nothing about it. And would you leave it at that? You don’t have to embarrass our guest by asking a question.’

    Fox News Digital reached out to Biden’s office for comment and has not yet received a reply. 

    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

    No Senate Republicans blocked an attempt to force a vote on a resolution that would compel the release of documents and files related to Jeffrey Epstein.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., made good on his vow to force a vote on the resolution just hours after it passed through the House behind a near unanimous wave of support.

    Schumer argued on the floor that the Senate ‘should pass this bill as soon as possible, as written and without a hint of delay.’ 

    ‘Republicans must not try to change this bill or bury it in committee, or slow walk it in any way,’ he said. ‘Any amendment to this bill would force it back to the House and risk further delay. Who knows what would happen over there?’

    Now, as soon as the House transfers the bill to the Senate, it will go straight to President Donald Trump’s desk for his signature. 

    The resolution from Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif., would require that the Department of Justice (DOJ) release all unclassified records, documents, communications and investigative materials ‘publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format’ related to the late financier and convicted pedophile and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell within 30 days of the bill being signed into law. 

    The Epstein fervor has not had nearly the impact in the Senate as the House, which was thrust into chaos by the bipartisan push to see the release of the files. Earlier this year, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., put the House into recess to quell the Epstein drama and has since been accused of running from a vote on the issue.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said that Republicans were already mulling the bill through the hotline process, which is where legislation is considered among lawmakers before making it to the floor. Thune said the plan, if the bill clears the hotline, would be to have it on the floor before lawmakers leave for Thanksgiving recess at the end of this week. 

    ‘We’ll see what the Democrats have to say,’ he said. ‘But it’s the kind of thing, probably, that could perhaps move by unanimous consent.’

    That ended up not being necessary, with bill making its way through the upper chamber without a full vote. 

    The calculus surrounding the Epstein bill changed in the Senate, too, given that President Donald Trump, who for months railed against attempts to release the files, threw his support behind Massie and Khanna’s legislation over the weekend.

    He charged that it was a ‘Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party.’

    ‘Nobody cared about Jeffrey Epstein when he was alive and, if the Democrats had anything, they would have released it before our Landslide Election Victory,’ he said in a post on Truth Social.

    Senate Republicans, like their counterparts in the House, wanted more transparency on the issue when the Epstein saga resurfaced over the summer but cautioned that no materials should be released until the names or identifying traits of victims are combed through and kept safe.

    But, despite calls from Johnson to amend the bill to include those kinds of guardrails in the legislation, it’s unlikely to happen in the Senate. 

    ‘I think when a bill comes out of the House 427 to one, and the president said he’d sign it, I’m not sure that amending it is in the cards,’ Thune said. 

    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

    Rapper Nicki Minaj brought her star power to the United Nations to draw global attention to the persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    Minaj, who was born in Trinidad and Tobago, teamed up with President Donald Trump’s U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz to speak at an event hosted by the United States Mission to the United Nations that spotlighted religious violence and the killings of Christians in the most populous African nation.

    The rap mogul said she wanted to speak out against injustice and stand up for people who are persecuted for their beliefs.

    ‘In Nigeria, Christians are being targeted, driven from their homes and killed. Churches have been burned. Families have been torn apart and entire communities live in fear constantly, simply because of how they pray,’ she told attendees.

    ‘Sadly, this problem is not only a growing problem in Nigeria, but also in so many other countries across the world, and it demands urgent action,’ Minaj said. ‘And I want to be clear, protecting Christians in Nigeria is not about taking sides or dividing people. It is about uniting humanity.’

    Minaj, who has been a vocal supporter of the Trump administration’s actions to combat the persecution of Christians in Nigeria, seemed to distance herself from politics. Addressing her fans directly, who she calls ‘Barbz,’ she once again said that she was not ‘taking sides.’

    ‘Barbz, I know you’re somewhere listening. I love you so very much. You have been the ultimate light in my life and career for so long. I appreciate you and I want to make it very clear — once again — that this isn’t about taking sides. This is about standing up in the face of injustice. It’s about what I’ve always stood for my entire career. And I will continue to stand for that for the rest of my life. I will care if anyone, anywhere, is being persecuted for their beliefs,’ Minaj said.

    Waltz also spoke, calling the killings of Christians in Nigeria ‘genocide wearing the mask of chaos.’

    ‘There is a body of evidence, and you are going to hear that from our experts today that paints a very grim picture of disproportionate suffering among Christians, where, again, families are torn apart, clergy is repeatedly assassinated, and entire congregations, church congregations,’ he said.

    ‘Folks, we have an entire faith that is being erased. One bullet at a time, one torched Bible at a time.’

    The event featuring Waltz and Minaj came after Trump threatened in a November Truth Social post to send U.S. troops ‘guns-a-blazing’ into the most populous country in Africa to ‘completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.’

    The president also threatened to stop all aid and assistance if the violence continued.

    Nigerian President Bola Tinubu responded to Trump’s threat, writing on social media that his administration has worked with Christian and Muslim leaders to address security challenges affecting citizens across all faiths and regions.

    ‘The characterisation of Nigeria as religiously intolerant does not reflect our national reality, nor does it take into consideration the consistent and sincere efforts of the government to safeguard freedom of religion and beliefs for all Nigerians,’ he wrote on X.

    ‘Religious freedom and tolerance have been a core tenet of our collective identity and shall always remain so. Nigeria opposes religious persecution and does not encourage it.’

    Open Doors, an international Christian organization that supports persecuted believers, said attacks are most common in the northern, Muslim-majority states of Nigeria but have started spreading into the Middle Belt and farther south.

    The organization stated that Christians are at risk from targeted attacks by Islamist militants, including Fulani fighters and Boko Haram, and women are often killed and subjected to sexual violence.

    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

    President Donald Trump has demanded an end to excessive state-level regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) and warned that state rules will end up threatening the U.S. economy.

    In a post shared to Truth Social on Tuesday, Trump also slammed ‘Woke AI’ and referred to a ‘patchwork’ of state regulations in the AI space.

    ‘Investment in AI is helping to make the U.S. Economy the ‘HOTTEST’ in the World,’ Trump wrote.

    ‘But overregulation by the States is threatening to undermine this Major Growth Engine. Some States are even trying to embed DEI ideology into AI models, producing ‘Woke AI’ (Remember Black George Washington?). We MUST have one Federal Standard instead of a patchwork of 50 State Regulatory Regimes.’

    Trump made his comments as House Republican leaders signaled they may try to include AI preemption language in the annual National Defense Authorization Act. 

    This would block states from bringing in their own AI rules and protections.

    House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said Monday that GOP leaders are considering the measure to prevent what he called ‘regulatory chaos’ as states advance their own rules. 

    Trump’s push for a unified national framework is in line with his broader ‘Winning the AI Race: America’s AI Action Plan.’

    Under executive orders issued in July, federal agencies must avoid procuring AI systems that ‘sacrifice truthfulness and accuracy to ideological agendas,’ adhere to ‘Unbiased AI Principles’ and support the fight against AI-generated deepfakes through the ‘Take It Down Act.’

    Vice President JD Vance echoed Trump’s stance at February’s Artificial Intelligence Action Summit.

    ‘We believe that excessive regulation of the AI sector could kill a transformative industry just as it’s taking off,’ Vance said.

    Not all Republicans are on board. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis shared a post to X Tuesday and warned that overriding state authority would serve as a ‘subsidy to Big Tech’ and ‘prevent states from protecting against online censorship of political speech, predatory applications that target children, violations of intellectual property rights and data center intrusions on power/water resources.’

    Trump’s Truth Social post also came after Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman committed during Tuesday’s visit to the White House to increasing his planned investment in the U.S. economy to nearly $1 trillion over the next year.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., raised concerns Tuesday about the government’s potential use of taxpayer funds to support OpenAI and other AI firms.

    ‘OpenAI’s actions suggest that it may be pursuing a deliberate strategy to entangle itself with the federal government and the broader economy, so the government has no choice but to step in with public funds,’ she said in a letter.

    ‘We have seen this before: take on enough debt, make enough risky bets, and then demand a taxpayer bailout when those bets go south, so the economy does not crash.’

    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS